tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post2879219270050786934..comments2023-10-09T06:50:31.655-07:00Comments on the new wave: From Singur, via Nandigram to Lalgarh: Zig Zag of Maoist Train and the Paradox of Developmentthe new wavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09771161911229867233noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post-13839854458109619302009-10-30T06:27:12.855-07:002009-10-30T06:27:12.855-07:00in the first instance, Sumanta must understand tha...in the first instance, Sumanta must understand that there may be so many models of capitalist development, from 'social-welfare' to 'free-market', but they are all models of development, essentially capitalist in its organisation. Like Stalinists, Maoists also swing between them. They call for 'humanization' of capitalism, and become its reformist guards, the the new wavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09771161911229867233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post-60851889355882761032009-10-30T05:20:15.620-07:002009-10-30T05:20:15.620-07:00The article makes it clear that the concept of ...The article makes it clear that the concept of 'new democracy' as concieved by Maoists, is nothing but an apology against destruction of bourgeois property and it does not traverse beyond the contours of capitalism. 'Bloc of Four Classes' includes 'national'(!)capitalists into the framework of 'new democracy'.<br /><br />Now in defence of Maoists Sumanta says,"the new wavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09771161911229867233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post-74536379883598691542009-10-30T00:53:36.759-07:002009-10-30T00:53:36.759-07:00I'm sorry to say that the article is full of c...I'm sorry to say that the article is full of contradictions. It is unsubstantiated by facts. May I ask the author to read the programme of the CPI(Maoist) and their statements on Nandigram, Singur and Lalgarh ? Nowhere in their programme or statements they've come out with support for capitalist development. When they talk about the need for development in Lalgarh's tribal areas, theySumanta Banerjeenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post-14629380013440785742009-10-27T02:29:15.851-07:002009-10-27T02:29:15.851-07:00A very thought provoking aticle for the revolution...A very thought provoking aticle for the revolutionarie. Would you, please allow us to translate it into hindi and then publish at our blog नया सर्वहारा पुनर्जागरण नया सर्वहारा प्रबोधन<br />http://samajvad.wordpress.com/ ?<br /><br />thanks in advanceशहीद भगत सिंह विचार मंच, संतनगरhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15974638576824560477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post-43618961260119758762009-10-25T07:20:17.105-07:002009-10-25T07:20:17.105-07:00Rather your perspective is flawed and you have not...Rather your perspective is flawed and you have not read Marx and Engels adequately. Engels is on record defending the interests of petty producer i.e. what you call petty bourgeois peasant. The Marxist diatribe against rural idiocy etc. is not absolute. Later on they recognized the need to befriend and fight for the interests of small peasants too and also the need and importance of bourgeois Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2980877174090929350.post-30606021558191536322009-10-24T22:19:17.604-07:002009-10-24T22:19:17.604-07:00आपके विचार अति उत्तम हैं। बिल्कुल 16 आने दुरुस्...आपके विचार अति उत्तम हैं। बिल्कुल 16 आने दुरुस्त कि औद्योगिक सर्वहारा को संगठित किये बिना पेटी बोर्जुआ रूमानियत का दौ-दौरा बना रहेगा। प्वाइंट साइज बढाओ भाई नजर कमजोर है/ हिंदी तथा अन्य भारतीय भाषाओं के जरिये भी अपनी बात कहने का प्रयास करें। अपने बारे में हिंदी में बतायें अंग्रेजी जरा कमजोर है। वैसे बिरादर जान पडते हैं।कामता प्रसादhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10017796675691176190noreply@blogger.com