Our Correspondent/ 7.11.2012
Apart from
party activists, the conference was well attended by representatives of
different political groups and media persons.
The WSP is a
section of the movement of ‘Fourth International’ established by Leon Trotsky
in 1939, in the aftermath of degeneration of the Third International
(Comintern), consequent to the betrayals of Stalinists.
On this occasion, the WSP launched its 35 page
program, titled as ‘Political Statement’, calling upon the youth and workers to
organise the revolutionary Marxist party of working class around the program of
permanent revolution. The program can be accessed at: http://new-wave-nw.blogspot.in/p/our-programme.html
Political Statement of WSP has called upon the
youth and workers to resurrect the revolutionary Marxist party-
‘Bolshevik-Leninist Party of India (BLPI)’, that was formed in late 1930’s and
had existed through 40’s, before its unfortunate dissolution in CSP. WSP has
criticised this dissolution and has vowed to resurrect the BLPI, declaring
itself as true inheritor of the BLPI.
BLPI has
glorious history to its credit. In contrast to the Stalinist CPI that had shamefully
collaborated with British Colonialists during 1942, the BLPI called upon the
Indian working class for overthrow of the British regime through a socialist
revolution. BLPI was only party which had consistently fought against colonial
power and openly supported the naval mutiny in 1946, bringing industrial workers
on roads in open demonstrations in Bombay and Madras. BLPI opposed the
Mountbatten plan of communal partition of India and creation of two dominion Hindu-Muslim
states of India and Pakistan on communal basis. The party termed the 1947
settlement as shameful compromise between foreign and Indian bourgeois, which
CPI had welcomed as ‘limited freedom’.
In its
program, the WSP has termed Stalinist, Maoist and Centrist parties as agents of
Capitalism and enemies of working class and has vowed to fight against them. Party
has severely criticised the left parties for their complacence with and
capitulation to the capitalist-landlord regime in the country.
WSP
criticised the Stalinist left parties for adhering to the ruling Congress on
the pretext of keeping fascist BJP at bay. The party insisted that fascism is
nothing but capitalist reaction, and working class is all capable to smash its
ugly head. Fascism can win only if Stalinists, centrists and social-democrats continue
to hold back the working class and prevent it from responding to the impending capitalist
crisis through a revolutionary struggle to uproot the capitalist rule. WSP rejected
the policy of “popular frontism” pursued by Stalinist-Maoist parties in forging
‘fronts’ with bourgeois and petty bourgeois parties. It pointed out that ‘Popular
frontism’, the capitulationist thesis propounded by Stalin for collaboration
with sections of bourgeois, has caused immense damage to world proletarian
revolution, from China through Germany to Spain.
Party
severely criticised the Stalinist-Maoist “two-stage” theory of revolution, i.e.
‘democracy today-socialism tomorrow’. It said that all talks about ‘new
democracy’ ‘peoples democracy’ and ‘revolutionary democracy’, isolated from
socialist revolution are nothing but empty phrases of Stalinists-Maoists to
mislead the working class and hold it back from taking to power.
WSP is the
only party to clearly propose dictatorship of the proletariat in place of
dictatorship of capitalists, cloaked under the veil of ‘democracy’.
WSP proposed
the “permanent revolution”, as the only road to revolution, that had formed the
basis of October revolution. Path of Permanent Revolution, is opposed to the
Stalinist-Maoist idea of “two stage” revolution, through which they propose to
postpone the establishment of proletarian dictatorship for indefinite future
and bind the working class to bourgeois democracy.
Party termed
the collapse of Soviet Union and the East European countries as the collapse of
Stalinist nationalist program. WSP also
said that Maoism is nothing but the Chinese variant of Stalinism and is
backyard of world capitalism, its industrial workshop. It said that 1949
overturn in China was a bureaucratic overturn, and not a proletarian revolution.
WSP sets
itself the aim of proletarian revolution in South Asia leading to a Socialist Union
of Soviet States of South Asia on voluntary basis, thereby undo the partition
of Indian sub-continent in 1947, and through it, advance towards a world
socialist revolution.
Party
rejected any legitimacy of slogan of ‘national-liberation’, except that of
declaration and acceptance of a formal ‘right to self determination’. WSP
underlined that the unification of national states on a socialist basis, is the
only resolution to the problem of nationalities including Kashmir and North-East,
and to innumerable wars and violent military conflicts among the nation states.
Needless to say that coming to power of the proletariat through proletarian revolutions,
is the necessary condition for such socialist unification.
The party scornfully
rejected the Stalinist-Maoist theory of achieving Socialism in one country as
bogus and un-realizable, terming the very idea as ‘national socialist’, making
it clear that realisation of socialism within national frontiers of any single
country in the world, is unthinkable.
Party
emphasized the international character of the revolution and said that the same
stands ratified by the recent upheavals in Middle-East and struggles in
European countries, where masses in several countries from Tunisia to Egypt and
from Greece to Spain, had risen together against the ruling elites.
Party said that a global crisis, no
less intense than that of 1930’s, has once again engulfed world capitalism. As
capitalist states attempt to shift the burden of this crisis to the shoulders
of working class, it fights back, triggering a widespread unrest and huge
political crisis everywhere in the world from Europe through Asia and Latin
Americas to Africa.
WSP termed
the uprisings in Middle-East, offshoot of a systemic failure of the corrupt and
exploitative misrule of capitalists, leading to a real crisis, other side of
which is unveiling itself in European sub continent- from Greece to Spain
through Italy and France- where working class is up in arms not only against
capitalists, but the Trade Union bureaucracies too.
The turmoil, that ensued recently,
from breakdown of the global capitalist system, has awakened and mobilised
millions of workers against capitalist states, bringing the working class onto
the centre of political stage, once again. Mighty mass movements have ousted
the ossified regimes in countries of Middle East and North Africa, one after
the other. However, absence of revolutionary program and revolutionary party at
the head of the insurgent mass, dampened the hopes of a real revolution in
advance. Sections of financial and corporate elites, thus once again took
control of the situation and could re-stabilise the capitalist system for the
moment.
The whole political crisis in our
times reflects itself into the crisis of leadership of the sole revolutionary
class- the international working class.The challenge before the working class,
thus, is to build a genuine socialist alternative to capitalism. This requires,
at the outset, a revolutionary program and a revolutionary party around it. The
Party said that its first and foremost task is thus to arm the advanced
elements of working class with this revolutionary program and organise them
into the sole revolutionary party, WSP, in order to forge genuine leadership of
the revolution.
WSP pointed
out that the major and determinant contradictions in today’s world, are twin contradictions-
i.e. between developing world capitalist economy and the ossified cage of national-states
on one hand; and on the other between the socialised production and private
consumption. The two world wars and innumerable military conflicts in the last
century are result of this conflict, which remains unresolved even today with
ever more sharpening of these contradictions. WSP claimed that only World
Socialist Revolution can present a real viable resolution to this conflict.
WSP
criticised the role of trade unions, invariably headed by bureaucracies, in repeatedly
failing the working class and its struggles. These Trade Unions, as they remain
dominated by rightist BMS, centrist HMS-INTUC and Stalinist AITUC-CITU, have
played a pernicious role in binding the workers to meagre economic demands and
prevented it from opening a broad political offensive against the ruling
pro-corporate governments. Citing the recent Maruti-Suzuki struggle as glaring
example, where all of these Trade Unions after pledging for ‘industrial peace’
have held back the workers from organising a general strike against savage
repression by corporates and the state under them, after similar betrayals in Foxconn
and BYD, the party claimed that these trade unions have consistently betrayed
the interests of working class and have become hand-tools of capitalists. The
party called upon the workers to overthrow the yoke of the ossified trade union
organisation, come out of their decayed shells, set up independent struggle
committees everywhere comprising of most militant workers, and develop them
into soviets of workers, gradually.
WSP made it
clear that its aim is to overturn the rule of capitalists and establishment of
dictatorship of the Proletariat, in the form of a Workers’-Peasants’ Government.
The party pointed out that the main hurdle on the path of revolution are the
Stalinist-Maoist and centrist parties who are misleading and holding back the working
class from taking to the path of revolution. The party took it to itself to
expose these alien trends, the covert agents of capitalism inside labour
movement, and defeat them politically, as it’s focussed and primary task.
The WSP would
have its primary built up in key cities and industrial centres in the country
and would focus on its work on arming the advanced sections of the working
class and youth with lessons of October revolution and the strategic experience
of the last century, through successes and failures.
What are your disagreements with the International Communist League 4th Internationalist (Spartacist league)?
ReplyDelete